| |
|
|
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA La Estanzuela; INIA Las Brujas; INIA Tacuarembó. |
|
Fecha : |
21/02/2014 |
|
Actualizado : |
16/10/2019 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Agropecuarias |
|
Autor : |
CASTRO, M.; CERETTA, S.; GARCIA, A.; VÁZQUEZ, D. |
|
Afiliación : |
MARINA CASTRO DERENYI, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; SERGIO EDUARDO CERETTA SORIA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; ADRIANA GARCIA LAMOTHE, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; DANIEL VÁZQUEZ PEYRONEL, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
|
Título : |
Elementos a tener en cuenta para lograr producir trigos de buena calidad |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2006 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Revista INIA, 2006, no. 7, p. 17-19 |
|
Serie : |
(Revista INIA; 7) |
|
ISSN : |
1510-9011 |
|
Idioma : |
Español |
|
Thesagro : |
CALIDAD; CALIDAD PANADERA; CEREALES; CULTIVOS; TRIGO. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
--
F01 Cultivo |
|
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/823/1/111219220807163431.pdf
|
|
Marc : |
LEADER 00584naa a2200229 a 4500
001 1012962
005 2019-10-16
008 2006 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a1510-9011
100 1 $aCASTRO, M.
245 $aElementos a tener en cuenta para lograr producir trigos de buena calidad
260 $c2006
490 $a(Revista INIA; 7)
650 $aCALIDAD
650 $aCALIDAD PANADERA
650 $aCEREALES
650 $aCULTIVOS
650 $aTRIGO
700 1 $aCERETTA, S.
700 1 $aGARCIA, A.
700 1 $aVÁZQUEZ, D.
773 $tRevista INIA, 2006, no. 7, p. 17-19
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
|
 | Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Tacuarembó. Por información adicional contacte bibliotb@tb.inia.org.uy. |
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Tacuarembó. |
|
Fecha actual : |
21/02/2014 |
|
Actualizado : |
11/05/2020 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - -- |
|
Autor : |
OLIVER, M.A.; NUTE, G.R.; FONT I FURNOLS, M.; SAN JULIÁN, R.; CAMPO, M.M.; SAÑUDO, C.; CAÑEQUE, V.; GUERRERO, L.; ALVAREZ, I.; DIAZ, M.T.; BRANSCHEID, W.; WICKE, M.; MONTOSSI, F. |
|
Afiliación : |
MARIA ANGELS OLIVER, IRTA-Centre de Tecnologia de la Carn, Monells (Girona), Spain; GEOFFREY R. NUTE, Division of Farm Animal Science, University of Bristol, Langford, United Kingdom; M. FONT I FURNOLS, IRTA-Centre de Tecnologia de la Carn, Monells (Girona), Spain; ROBERTO SAN JULIAN SANCHEZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; M. M. CAMPO, Facultad de Veterinaria, Zaragoza, Spain; CARLOS SAÑUDO, Facultad de Veterinaria, Zaragoza, Spain; VICENTE CAÑEQUE, SGIT-INIA Madrid, Spain; LUIS GUERRERO ASOREY, IRTA-Centre de Tecnologia de la Carn, Monells (Girona), Spain; INMACULADA ALVAREZ, SGIT-INIA Madrid, Spain; MARÍA TERESA DÍAZ, SGIT-INIA Madrid, Spain; WOLFGANG BRANSCHEID, Institut for Meat Production and Market Research, Kulmbach, Germany; MICHAEL WICKE, Forschungs- und Studienzentrum fur Veredelungswirtschaft der Universitat Gottingen, Vechta, Germany; FABIO MARCELO MONTOSSI PORCHILE, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
|
Título : |
Eating quality of beef, from different production systems, assessed by German, Spanish and British consumers. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2006 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Meat Science, November 2006, Volume 74, Issue 3, Pages 435-442. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2006.03.010 |
|
DOI : |
10.1016/j.meatsci.2006.03.010 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Received 3 November 2005 // Received in revised form 10 March 2006 // Accepted 10 March 2006. Acknowledgements: This authors thank the Agencia Espan?ola de Cooperacio´n Internacional (AECI), the Instituto Nacional de Investigacio´n Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA) de Espan?a and the Intituto Nacional de Investigacio´n Agraria (INIA)
from Uruguay for the financial support to the project. We thank the technicians from the different teams as well as Nigel Scollan at the Institute of Grassland and Environmental Research (Wales, UK) for his help in recruiting consumers in Wales. |
|
Contenido : |
The acceptability of beef from Uruguay (UY), based on eating quality, was compared with beef produced in different European countries (Germany, DE, Spain, ES and United Kingdom, UK). Consumer tests were conducted in DE, ES and UK (each comprising 200 consumers) using ?Hall Tests?. In each country four samples were evaluated, two from Hereford steers from UY (finished at 2 and 3 years) and two from local meat (the same meat sample aged 7 or 20 d). Consumers evaluated tenderness, flavour and overall acceptability using 8-point category scales. Hierarchical cluster analysis, highlighted the existence of different clusters of consumers. Two main clusters were identified in DE and UK. The main cluster identified in DE, was labelled as Prefer foreign-imported beef (n = 128). These consumers preferred (P < 0.05) the samples from UY_2y in terms of tenderness and overall acceptability. The other cluster was labelled as Prefer local beef in terms of flavour and overall acceptability (P < 0.05) and comprised the majority of consumers from ES (n = 176) and UK
(n = 153) and the cluster 2 from DE (n = 69). UK, cluster 2 (n = 33) that did not discriminate between origin and ageing time of beef. These results indicate that consumers did not prefer the same type of meat within the same country and it is possible that there are individual preferences that could lead to the concept of market segmentation being based on taste preferences. It would appear that Uruguayan beef would be very acceptable in Germany and to a lesser extent in Britain and Spain, although further studies are required that include labelling information. MenosThe acceptability of beef from Uruguay (UY), based on eating quality, was compared with beef produced in different European countries (Germany, DE, Spain, ES and United Kingdom, UK). Consumer tests were conducted in DE, ES and UK (each comprising 200 consumers) using ?Hall Tests?. In each country four samples were evaluated, two from Hereford steers from UY (finished at 2 and 3 years) and two from local meat (the same meat sample aged 7 or 20 d). Consumers evaluated tenderness, flavour and overall acceptability using 8-point category scales. Hierarchical cluster analysis, highlighted the existence of different clusters of consumers. Two main clusters were identified in DE and UK. The main cluster identified in DE, was labelled as Prefer foreign-imported beef (n = 128). These consumers preferred (P < 0.05) the samples from UY_2y in terms of tenderness and overall acceptability. The other cluster was labelled as Prefer local beef in terms of flavour and overall acceptability (P < 0.05) and comprised the majority of consumers from ES (n = 176) and UK
(n = 153) and the cluster 2 from DE (n = 69). UK, cluster 2 (n = 33) that did not discriminate between origin and ageing time of beef. These results indicate that consumers did not prefer the same type of meat within the same country and it is possible that there are individual preferences that could lead to the concept of market segmentation being based on taste preferences. It would appear that Uruguayan beef would be very accept... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
BEEF; CONSUMERS; OVERALL ACCEPTABILITY; PRODUCTION SYSTEM. |
|
Thesagro : |
CARNE. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
L01 Ganadería |
|
Marc : |
LEADER 03256naa a2200349 a 4500
001 1027449
005 2020-05-11
008 2006 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.1016/j.meatsci.2006.03.010$2DOI
100 1 $aOLIVER, M.A.
245 $aEating quality of beef, from different production systems, assessed by German, Spanish and British consumers.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2006
500 $aArticle history: Received 3 November 2005 // Received in revised form 10 March 2006 // Accepted 10 March 2006. Acknowledgements: This authors thank the Agencia Espan?ola de Cooperacio´n Internacional (AECI), the Instituto Nacional de Investigacio´n Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA) de Espan?a and the Intituto Nacional de Investigacio´n Agraria (INIA) from Uruguay for the financial support to the project. We thank the technicians from the different teams as well as Nigel Scollan at the Institute of Grassland and Environmental Research (Wales, UK) for his help in recruiting consumers in Wales.
520 $aThe acceptability of beef from Uruguay (UY), based on eating quality, was compared with beef produced in different European countries (Germany, DE, Spain, ES and United Kingdom, UK). Consumer tests were conducted in DE, ES and UK (each comprising 200 consumers) using ?Hall Tests?. In each country four samples were evaluated, two from Hereford steers from UY (finished at 2 and 3 years) and two from local meat (the same meat sample aged 7 or 20 d). Consumers evaluated tenderness, flavour and overall acceptability using 8-point category scales. Hierarchical cluster analysis, highlighted the existence of different clusters of consumers. Two main clusters were identified in DE and UK. The main cluster identified in DE, was labelled as Prefer foreign-imported beef (n = 128). These consumers preferred (P < 0.05) the samples from UY_2y in terms of tenderness and overall acceptability. The other cluster was labelled as Prefer local beef in terms of flavour and overall acceptability (P < 0.05) and comprised the majority of consumers from ES (n = 176) and UK (n = 153) and the cluster 2 from DE (n = 69). UK, cluster 2 (n = 33) that did not discriminate between origin and ageing time of beef. These results indicate that consumers did not prefer the same type of meat within the same country and it is possible that there are individual preferences that could lead to the concept of market segmentation being based on taste preferences. It would appear that Uruguayan beef would be very acceptable in Germany and to a lesser extent in Britain and Spain, although further studies are required that include labelling information.
650 $aCARNE
653 $aBEEF
653 $aCONSUMERS
653 $aOVERALL ACCEPTABILITY
653 $aPRODUCTION SYSTEM
700 1 $aNUTE, G.R.
700 1 $aFONT I FURNOLS, M.
700 1 $aSAN JULIÁN, R.
700 1 $aCAMPO, M.M.
700 1 $aSAÑUDO, C.
700 1 $aCAÑEQUE, V.
700 1 $aGUERRERO, L.
700 1 $aALVAREZ, I.
700 1 $aDIAZ, M.T.
700 1 $aBRANSCHEID, W.
700 1 $aWICKE, M.
700 1 $aMONTOSSI, F.
773 $tMeat Science, November 2006, Volume 74, Issue 3, Pages 435-442. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2006.03.010
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Tacuarembó (TBO) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
